Andrada Mining acquisition elevates the miner to emerging mid-tier status. Watch the video here.
"As you likely know fine well semaphorRed, I was referring to the warrants which expired, not the agreement to represent us in Morocco"
I know you were referring to them and I said they'd been extended, you implied he was being given them for nothing since they'd expired. Clearly his work was continuing and continuing in response to commensurate reward. I don't see the issue here.
"And the reason it expired"
Apparently it didn't - it was extended, and thank goodness it was, look at the result.
"Nothing like a bit of a backhander to get things rolling..just a little excessive imo"
What on earth are you talking about? This deal has been public knowledge for years - it's literally performance pay, it's what ever moaner on this board demands constantly.
"If we can get an SP of 2p today it will be fantastic."
I know this is probably going to be taken as facile or trolling but, genuinely, why?
"Plus, the OCP LOI held by QED to trail around the Mediterranean (read: CEPSA Refineria San Roque) ) is massive news and something we’ve never had before."
And what is this LOI exactly and what does it mean?
BP: his point is correct. The framework agreement is why the SP is not moving. It is neither a good nor bad thing, simply the explanation. Commercial agreements will come, but they have not done so yet.
"Hopefully we get a JM interview today/tomorrow with an update re: where we are with MSC."
And to fully explain this RNS! Feels like I'm the only one who can't fully wrap their head around the two elements here.
".Whether it does work, or not, is irrelevant"
Fair enough but it definitely doesn't
"you pig face just pretend you are"
No one can pretend to be that thick and so consistently. It would take a world class thespian
If we were to receive a positive RNS regarding this, what would that RNS say? Or, to put it another way, what is the next RNSable step that we're waiting for?
Infighting and nonsense can be effectively solved by responding solely to the content of the post, rather than the person. Or ignoring said content.
"Prince Vince reminds the proletariat that criticism of His Princeliness and/or His Princeliness' opinions is deemed censorship."
He was responding to a literal suggestion of censorship.
This platform is moderated by a company not "us" and the very last think you'd want is to be in a meaningless echo chamber. I don't even filter, it just doesn't take that long to read nonsense - half the time I'm writing it myself.
I mean, his opinion is based on facts. That's true of all posts. What else is there?
My question is regarding the potential customers for the Utah MSAR. How will they be found and will it be difficult to get them?
"Plus hes taken approx £1m out of the company in the last 3 years."
If all the shareholders organised and voted to fire Jason, who would we hire to replace him? What do you think oil industry CEOs earn? And where would you find one with the emulsion engineering experience?
"Please get something over the line or give up and sell the business/Technology"
An incredibly silly comment, especially if you were aiming for a reply. Especially since they don't own the company to sell, we do.
To note: it takes about a year to build a motor yacht of this sort, but can be shorter if they're using an already-laid hull.
"I understand the frustration but that is incorrect information, you can't say QED has never generated any commercial revenue in 20 years, otherwise it would be out of business for sure!"
It... literally hasn't generated any revenue in 20 years.
It is inarguable that the US is the world's premier money raising market, and always has been.
" I imagine the SP would re-rate pretty quickly on such an announcement"
Yes that makes sense.