Listen to our latest Investing Matters Podcast episode 'Uncovering opportunities with investment trusts' with The AIC's Richard Stone here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
which hasn't been much discussed is the departure of DC.
We now know definitively that he was sacked, but we have no idea why. He had initiated the merger and the SR, so what happened? I suppose if his unfair dismissal claim actually reaches the courts we may get a better understanding.
I know people will say this is all ancient history, but it seems to me it could have a real bearing on what's going on now.
Thoughts?
Not sure whose posts you're reading Darren but on balance I'd say thinking there will be a TO is pretty positive, no? Saying we won't get one soon is realism, and understanding of the process, not negativity. Countering rampers is not negativity.
You don't follow football then, dbw? Cov isn't suggesting people stop supporting, they just don't blindly pretend things are fine or say they are great.
In my opinion Most “genuine” supporters stick with their team through thick and thin
If the football team you were supporting were constantly underperforming would anyone be happy , or would they be moaning and saying how carp they are? I see this as the same situation , underperforming so we have every right to moan and be negative.
Point taken. Im always open to other views. wether I agree or not! Isnt that what this bb is about?
GLA
All the best
DK
I never mentioned a TO. FWIW I think there will be this year. My question was why are you so negative?
If you dont believe in this company then why are you invested long term\?
GLA
DK
Darren. Someone can be invested here, and hope to eventually make a profit that rewards holding, but still take a negative view of how our management have performed over recent years and be vocal about that.. They can also be vocal about pointing out clear ramping. It doesn’t make them negative..
I want to see and read both sides of an argument.
Not just endless posts about, good news coming this week I reckon… or, this will be sold before Christmas, please recommend my post….
The price is where it is because there are clear risks that not everything is rosy in our garden.. in fact parts of our garden look like they are in danger of turning brown. not every post has to be positive spun propaganda..
1981, I understand full-well what the meaning of catalyst is, particularly in a corporate sense, and the points mentioned, when seen in the context of what preceded them, are most definitely catalysts. I suspect part of the problem is that you haven't been a shareholder long enough to understand the complete picture.
And if you read my penultimate sentence you would have seen I do not anticipate an imminent transaction. Please don't put words in my mouth.
Darren- it isn't negative to say there won't be a takeover this year.
Add, if you think they are catalysts for an imminent merger then I'm afraid you're going to be disappointed by the wait. These are some of the same talking points the rampers have been relying on whilst posting nonsense. What you've listed are a series of signs that Solgold are keen for corporate action. Do you see the difference between those and the catalysts for a TO?
And
1981 you say you are long time in, what invested in a company that you think will suceed and you are invested? or you are long time in for a sneeky short!! I dont understand your negativity?
An honhest answer would be much appreciated
GLA
DK
Excellent summary addicknt! We are heading to that crunch point. Of monetisation.
You say people don't understand the catalysts, I would argue they are plain to see.
1. The announcement of the SR last year.
2. The merger.
3. The statements of Bob Sangha.
4. The very clear statement from Caldwell at the PDAC conference.
5. Mather's comments to the DGR shareholders.
And whilst I agree an imminent transaction is unlikely, the fact is the catalysts are most certainly there. It's all a question of timing.
I'm in long. Sorry that my calling out blatant ramping is annoying. I can see that it might be, as there is opportunity to do so often! So long as fort, red, bubble et al. continue to post rampy nonsense, I'll provide the logical counter narrative that they so hate. Not for your benefit, you understand.
I have said before that I think there will be a TO or significant asset sale here, and it's one of the options that keeps me here. Claiming it is imminent is a clear sign that people don't understand the catalysts for corporate action. They draw laughable comparisons to Noront, or claim that having Maxit on board means we're just moments away. I assume they do so because they're either being paid, or they're so far underwater they've resorted to trying to move the SP with their words here!
If you are betting on the share price going down, then that is your gamble, I understand that, the same antigamble I want the sp to be way higher than it is now, thats my gamble!! At least man up and state your intentions!!
GLA
DK
Addicknt many thanks for clarification on trade much appreciated
morning all. 1981 I dont post so often but you are getting on my t ts!! Are you a shorter? Come clean what is your agenda? Why are you so negative constantly?
GLA
DK
Sure, add, you're probably right...
1981, no, I don't. I think much of what you describe is purely a case of ignorance and is rarely of malicious intent. I've seen very few examples of situations on here where a poster may have tried to distort things, and when they have they tend to get a good kicking.
Ha! Add, you've inadvertently done Fort's homework for him, and answered your own call for evidence of misinformation. A month ago I challenged him to explain how BRs inter-fund moves were keeping the SP down (he was using this deliberate misinformation to explain the low sp and fit his rampy narrative). Unsurprisingly, because he's not very bright, he couldn't even find an answer on Google so just ignored both times I asked. Classic ramper behavior, once they've peddled misinformation.
Thanks on both counts. Nice to be vindicated. Hopefully now you accept that deliberate misinformation has been shared on this board. If you take the time to read back, you'll find countless other examples from this ramper and others.
Atb.
Sunstone drilling nearby
Can’t remember such high numbers being attributed to Tandayama….. but then again it’s been a long time since updates
“This region is also home to some famous neighbours: El Palmar is on the same regional structural belt that hosts the 2.66-billion-tonne Alpala copper-gold deposit and the 530-million-tonne Tandayama-America deposit”
This trade was an off-book transaction using the Echo venue and was a TNCP transaction, which is the description for a non-price forming trade. In other word, it was between two parties and had no impact on the market - it could simply have been the case of one shareholder shifting shares between two separate funds.
The Echo Venue is a system used by the LSE to provide transparency under the MiFID 11 regulations.
For gods sake , 4 trades
DCTA