IntelliAM aiming for significant growth with £5 million Aquis IPO. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Price/Book1.52
Not sure fundamentals mean much on AIM casino .
This the only site to state a PE Ratio -255.41834 more usual to see N/A.
Shares in Issue 944.22m
Market Cap. £344.17m
Market Size 50,000
PE Ratio -255.41834
Earnings -0.142707
Dividend 0.00
Yield 0.00%
Topped up today twice as many as last buy for 29.1p.
Last buy just over one month ago when I paid 35.7p ( 22% more )
Interesting long post from Scot126 on here today .
"Factual rebuttal and request for apology"
I call on everyone to agree to disagree , shake hands and move on. No need for nastiness. People only read or see what they want to see anyway. GLA.
BEWARE OF SCOT
This is the creature who was encouraging everyone to buy this 'sure bet' at £1.20+
He only has one agenda here, and if you are listening to a word he says you should be quetioning your sanity.
Don't beleve me? check his posting history in Q1 2022
08:13
May I also say he (and a couple of others) constantly comes onto the 88E board to encourage investors to change and invest in PANR. We can all see his agenda.
BEWARE OF SCOT126: his post contain detailed, factual information and comparative analysis.
Many dislike his thorough content because it does not fit their beliefs or agendas. BEWARE of posters who are UNABLE to respond to his content with facts.
Omg, Scot the fantasist, let me be absolutely ultra clear you'll get no apology from me. Your arrogance is astonishing to think that your long winded explanation of process gives you any level of authority, or justifies the past attitude of the board. Perhaps before butting in your pumped chest you should first understand the context of the discussion and the ethical position displayed by the past directors, particularly as the argument surrounded their interests being aligned with shareholders. However I shall not require 3 posts to lay out the facts.
1. The directors sold a whole load of shares pocketing a huge financial benefit to themselves by the sale of shares at a high price provided by a load of options shares at a low price. If as the argument goes the directors wished to show alignment to shareholders then they simply would not have done that.
No one cares about the process, no one cares about physically how the funds will have been delivered to them, nor their tax handling position, and I expect few think your ridiculous arrogant post justifies the argument. Likely it will be ticked up just because you support the ramping position you take, but I read your post as nothing more than a politician explaining to the electorate that it was ok to be awarded all these dodgy contracts because they were within the law, irrespective of how unethical it might have seemed as they pocketed huge swaths of cash.
Ok here is a fact for you scouser.
In Q3 2021 I was clear that I'd sold all my PANR at 85p and at 100%+ gain, and recommended everyone be very careful to lock in profits. Scot openly ridiculed me.
What's today's share price?
Check your facts, his post history is in the open and it's mainly thousands of pages pseudoscientific nonsense
Anyway, that's all I'll be saying on this topic for a while apart from one parting shot. - It's just not worth the energy
Scot claims to have worked as a / for a market maker, yet he is here all the time posting nothing but positive statements about PANR or encouraging people to ditch other prospects to buy here. If you were in his shoes, having worked in the markets for years (and and by assumption having made a fortune), would you be spending hours posting on a forum, or would you be on a yacht sipping G&T's?
Anyway, I'm off. My G&T has just arrived.
Oh and I might add, that perhaps if the directors, who by the way are extremely well paid, whether exec or non exec, wished to show their alignment with shareholders, perhaps they would not take huge option packages.
How nice it would be for a retail investor to have options, ie no risk packages whilst being paid large salaries also, whilst also not delivering the share price gains required by those retail investors in which to make a return.
No, if the directors wished to show alignment, why not make their bonuses or any shareholder offerering based on share price performance only and also non dilutionary, now that would be aligning.
The only reason Stas posts on this PANR board as per his post 18.4.24 11.25 -
" I shall cease my input on this board, .....unless of course Scot and olderwiser that have absolutely no financial interest in 88e continue their attack there. "
Stazi!! Do you know how much the directors are paid? I do not. I know how much guys with the knowledge get paid without becoming a director. I was one!! I was paid more than they are at one time in my life.
Sold the last double up top up for 36p up 30% at around time of sale.
30% gain in 22 days.
They dropped a bit lower day after on 15th May .
Set order high at 10am executed 11am looks like I got near the high of 36.8 it has pulled back a little in last hour.
Big operation this afternoon was going to refrain today .
The top up before last is also up as of now , maybe I am getting better at it, or just luckier .
From below.
Topped up today twice as many as last buy for 29.1p.
Last buy just over one month ago when I paid 35.7p ( 22% more )
Got them back today for 28p on 12% drop .
Many north sea stocks down as Labour say no new licences , this in sympathy maybe .
The 28p buy was second of day placed last half hour after Thursday return .
First buy today at 12.31pm paid 30p
Just seen the sale last week was in morning of the 5th , the operation went well and that sale an extra bonus , thank God.
In hindsight should of sold more .
Good I have doubled traunch size.
36 to 30 = 16.5%
Topped up again for 23.5p
28 to 23.5 = 15.5%
Ripley, you topped up too soon, just wait, this is going to be a bargain.
Mangrove Partners added to there short at 22p the price 11th September .
That looks good today , but not when 36p 19th September .
12 December it was 17p.
I do not expect to call it better then them with all there in and outside info ..Arch-Stanton
The Fund................................................. % Short Change Date Changed
The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd. 1.53%... 0.10%.... 11 Sep 2023