Listen to our latest Investing Matters Podcast episode 'Uncovering opportunities with investment trusts' with The AIC's Richard Stone here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Great read - hopefully the hike in interim divi will propell sp.
This should be interesting given Bellway’s announcement today. Perhaps a bit about the recent acquisitions and purchase strategy as Barrett seem awash with funds. No doubt some comment on leaseholder resolutions as that’s been generally quiet apart from builder pushback and the need for a more inclusive strategy.
Buy Buy Buy more bargains, Barratt land buyers.
As a man who works in this industry - I can tell you that the acquisition of Gladman is a stellar move.
Berenberg say BUY. Target 810
House price rise of over 11% must bode well for sp today .
Barratt Development was on the rise after Sky News City editor Mark Kleinman tweeted over the weekend that the housebuilders was set to announce its "first significant corporate acquisition for years", with the target being "a smaller regional player".
I see this has a buying opp, yes it more go lower but
Med term it will be back
Bought At £6 today —- feels too low to me, but as we
Know the market likes to bullies shares / sectors
Bought taylor wimp Also (same reason )
Looks like Gove wanting to appear tough and doing the right thing but totally unworkable in this format.
How does he expect cladding manufacturers to know where there products have been used and produce a list of buildings - they only know who they have sold the stuff to? Standby for a whole raft of companies closing down and starting again with a new name / company address.
Interesting to see if he will stop Bovis, Bdev, Wimpey et all selling houses as a threat.
Looking good on the news is now more important than actually solving the issue.
Bit of a shift in responsibility in this article after developer pushback. https://www.housingtoday.co.uk/news/cladding-manufacturers-must-pay-into-fund-or-face-ban-gove-says/5115733.article
JEFFERIES CUTS BARRATT DEVELOPMENTS TO 'HOLD' (BUY) - PRICE TARGET 644 (851) PENCE
Why the drop today - any ideas folks?
A building forum might be a better bet for a good answer. This is for shares!
Pooch or anyone who knows about the issues he talks about, can you explain a bit further as I am about to help my daughter get her first place . I thought that a brick external face guaranteed no EWS issues but now I am doubting that assumption.Is it necessary to check details of construction using combustible materials? If so is it Kingspan or something else? Advice would be much appreciated so as to not get into a mess.
Brokers say BUY.
To clarify further, EWS is an External Wall Survey used by RICS and lenders in the granting of mortgages, It is not a Government scheme and is not underwritten in any way by the Government or legislation. It came about post Grenfell as mortgage lenders sought to safeguard their lending.
Accordingly, whilst some flat owners with poor EWS scores may struggle to sell, it doesn't cost them anything until they try to sell and there is no Govt obligation to do anything about it so it won't affect builders unless they volunteer money for good PR. Shame for the poster and his dreams of profit from property may fall flat but nothing to do with BDEV.
As long as relevant building regs were complied with at time of build, Caveat Emptor just about sums it up
Just to further clarify, I don’t hold Barratt stock. Just commenting as someone who’s been stung in the markets before (as I’m sure we all have), and I don’t want anyone else to fall victim to Barratt so feel I should give further info on what I know and am going through. I encourage you to do your own research, (plenty of well informed people on Twitter - not often you can say that - on the ins and outs of the buildingsafetycrisis that can no doubt help you further understand the issues at hand, particularly on non cladding issues which are harder to identify) you may feel I am wrong on the scale and that’s fine, and given Barratt make £800m profit a year this may all have little impact on their share price even if they do end up paying out (one for the analysts to determine). But I wanted to give my 2pence worth. Hope it helps.
Make of this what you will, for transparency I comment as some one who does invest his earnings in shares though I had to close most positions last year because of well, this crisis (missed out on the bitcoin rise from 10k to 60 as a result, ironically that would likely have paid the bills faced).
I know if I were you I would want a fuller picture on this and not just the CEO shareholder pitch.
There isn’t a comprehensive list publicly. As an example though waterside park, in east London - for full transparency I own a flat there. This is. brick clad, c. 750 homes, built in 2015 - the site manager won a pride in job award for this, it had its ews rating down graded multiple times, first based on desktop surveys (I understand this is how Barratt manage to pass initial checks to sell their latest builds), then there were intrusive checks - this is where they look in the walls, and all manner of sins are uncovered - this level of check is usually done on builds where there is a new freeholder or managing agent in place.
Just across the park from that development is an older Barratt development, again brick and facing same issues. Their development at the Olympic park also has issues I understand but don’t quote me, and Oceana Boulevard in Southampton also has come up. These are just a few examples, many more have been expressed on Twitter (I don’t have a personal list) over last year. And it’s also believed (I think known, but to avoid a slap on the wrist I’ll go with believed) that suspect materials such as the insulation that is having to be removed from many builds, are still being used in their latest builds going up and on sale now, such as Upton gardens - where we understand existing residents are already struggling to get EWS reports from Barratt, which is raising concerns there. You’ll note that all these builds are very similar in their design, and can be seen applied to many more than mentioned here. In 2021 some leaseholders (not me) attempted to map out the impacted builds to highlight the scale: https://buildingsafetymap.co.uk/ This isn’t specific to Barratt and they have since stopped pushing this, I did enquire last year about Barratt developments listed and was informed they wouldn’t give out specifics but that a large number raised were stated as Barratt built developments. The map is thought to be far from conclusive and just a drop in the ocean. Working in London, almost every person I know here who owns a flat built in the last 20 years is impacted, and that list gets bigger by the week. The sheer fact that Barratts is one of the biggest builders, statistically suggests they are very much impacted. Barratts have not carried out their own assessments yet to my knowledge, which they promised in shareholder announcements - our build has been waiting since April, and they are yet to really look into it.
I hope that helps. Yes I am a bit biased, (hopefully I kept the emotion out) but as an investor I’d want to know.
It doesn't help when the manufacturer files for bankrupcy in order to avoid their responsibilites.
what ive seen with governments they wait for a catastrophy to happen then legislate to prevent it happening again for example madcow disease the banking crises hillsborough grenfill to name a few. this cladding should have had a fireproof certificate to say it was safe to use i believe the builders conformed to building regs ,so in my opinion the buck stops with the government or the manufacturers if it was labelled fire proof.
I should add that the cladding manufacturer will have submitted a fire compliance report. Who reviewed it? Who approved it? Was the correct level of dillegence applied? Was it washed over and signed off? The root cause lies somewhere here IMHO.
Agree @tomjones2. The root cause and hence liability lies with the manufacturer of exterior cladding materials and their compliance (or not) with the relevant fire specifications to enable certification of it. Builders would not be permitted to use non-compliant materials and any attempt by them to do this which later resulted in loss of life or property from fire would invalidate their indemnities and leave them bankrupt. The standards are there to protect everyone. I am surprised that Mr.Gove has not reflected this more strongly in his statement. I hope that his statement has not been biased by the fact that it is easier to go after domestic developers rather than the cladding firms, some of whom are international and whose products are being used in their own countries where building standards are dubious, which would lead to questions being asked there.
Just for Clarity , can you please know a few of the Barratt built locations of the types of dwelling that this relates to
1/3 of the costs*
Many of the rules around cladding are retrospective changes, and no doubt developers will put up a legal fight here. However this is far from just cladding thats the issue, cladding represents about a 3 of the costs many leaseholders are facing. It will be interesting to see how the non-cladding aspects play out, as many of these were regulated for such as the need for firebreaks, those are missing across large numbers of Barratt built developments.